Globalization and Multidisciplinary Approaches to Research

Anghie A. (2005). Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law (Cambridge University Press).

Arfaoui M. (2020). A Relational Approach to Heterodox versus Orthodox Positions in Contemporary Cultural Policy Debates, in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 7, 151.

Bartlett K. T. (1989). Feminist Legal Methods, in Harvard Law Review, vol. 103, 829.

Budtz Pedersen D. (2016). Integrating social sciences and humanities in interdisciplinary research, in Palgrave Communications, 2, no. 16036.

Burri T. (2025). Phenomenal International Law, Part 1: Chasing Chagos, available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=5782524.

Butler P. and Mulgan R. (2013). Can Academic Freedom Survive Performance Based Research Funding?, in Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, vol. 44, no. 3/4, 487.

Castiel L. D. and Sanz-Valero J. (2007). Between fetishism and survival: is the scientific article an academic commodity?, in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, vol. 23, no. 12, 3041.

Civitarese Matteucci S. (2014). Some Remarks on Methodology in Legal Studies in the Light of the Challenges That Globalization Poses to Legal Doctrine, in Revista Catalana de Dret Pùblic, vol. 48, 119.

Corten O. (2024). Méthodologie du droit international public, 2éme édition revue et augmentée (Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles).

Feyerabend P. (1979). Contre la méthode. Esquisse d’une théorie anarchiste de la connaissance [1971] (Seuil).

Guedes A. L. and Farias A. (2007). Globalization and International Management: In Search of an Interdisciplinary Approach, in Brazilian Administration Review, vol. 4, no. 2, 20.

Hakimi M. (2025). Thinking Constructively About International Law, Columbia Public Law Research Paper, No. 5432576, https://ssrn.com/abstract=5432576.

Janaki V. (2021), Multidisciplinary Research in the Social Sciences: Breaking new grounds, in Mind and Society, Vol. 10, No. III & IV, 134.

Jarrick A., Myrdal J. and Wallenberg-Bondesson M. (2016). Globalization and World History. An Introduction to Studies of Methods, in A. Jarrick, J. Myrdal and M. Wallenberg-Bondesson, eds., Methods in World History. A Critical Approach (Kriterium), 7.

Kennedy D. (2006). The Rise and Fall of Classical Legal Thought (Beard Books).

Kennedy D. (2003). Two Globalization of Law & (and) Legal Thought: 1850-1968, in Suffolk University Law Review, vol. 36, 631.

Lentner G. M. (2019). The Perils of Quantitative Research in International Law, in R. Deplano with G. Gentile and L. Lonardo, eds., Pluralising International Legal Scholarship. The Promise and Perils of Non-Doctrinal Research Methods (Edward Elgar Publishing), 149.

Lieblich E. (2021). How to do Research in International Law? A Basic Guide for Beginners, in Harvard International Law Journal Online, vol. 62, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?-abstract_id=3704776.

Morosini F. (2005). Globalization & Law: Beyond Traditional Methodology of Comparative Legal Studies and an Example from Private International Law, in Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law, vol. 13, 541.

Muchlinsky P. T. (2003). Globalization and Legal Research, in The International Lawyer, vol. 37, no. 1, 221.

Onuma Y. (2017). International Law in a Transcivilizational World (Cambridge University Press).

Pandey P. K. (2011). Problems and Prospects in Multidisciplinary Approach in Legal Research, in Indian Journal of Humanities, vol. 1, no. 4, 46.

Peat D. and Rose C. (2023). The Changing Landscape of International Law Scholarship: Do Funding Bodies Influence What We Research?, Grotius Centre Working Paper Series, No. 2023/102-PIL, 20 October 2023, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4613528.

Peat D. and Rose C. (2022). International law from the outside: Insights from the Dutch Research Council (NWO), in Leiden Journal of International Law, vol. 35, no. 1, 1.

Smith J. (2025). From Heterodoxy to Pluralism: The Need for a Conservative Paradigm in Social Science, in Theory and Society, vol. 54, 1119.

Taekema S. and Van der Burg W. (2024). Contextualizing Legal Research. A Methodological Guide (Edward Elgar Publishing).

Thelwall M., Simrick S., Viney I. and Van den Besselaar P. (2023). What is research funding, how does it influence research, and how is it recorded? Key dimensions of variation, in Scientometrics, no. 128, 6085.

Van Gestel R., Micklitz H.-W. and Poiares Maduro M. (2012). Methodology in the New Legal World, EUI Working Papers, 2012/13, https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/22016/LAW_2012-_13_VanGestelMicklitzMaduro.pdf.

Wight C. (2021). Critical Dogmatism: Academic Freedom Confronts Moral and Epistemological Certainty, in Political Studies Review, vol. 19, no. 2, 435.

Wolters G. (2013). European Humanities in Times of Globalized Parochialism, in Bulletin of the Italian Philosophical Society, N.S. 208, 3.

Yanitzky O. (2017). Current Globalization: A Challenge For The Humanities, in Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, Vol. 4, No. 12, 131.