What Remains of the West? Beyond Eurocentrism: A Perspective through the Analysis of the Multiplicity of International Law’s Narratives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.2724-6299/23440Keywords:
history of international law, globalization, the West, normativity, concreteness , transcivilizational approachAbstract
The central theme of this essay is the analysis of the multiplicity of narratives that have emerged in the history of International Law. This perspective highlights the transformation from a Eurocentric concep-tion to one that recognizes the plurality of interpretations of international law. The essay addresses the following topics: 1. the plurality of histories of International Law and the overcoming of the Eurocentric conception; 2. the comparison between the perspective of realism and that one of normativism; 3. the reformulation of the concept of the “West”; 4. a “transcivilization” perspective in international law.
Downloads
References
Anghie A. (1999). Finding the Peripheries: Sovereignty and Colonialism in Nineteenth Century International Law, in Harvard International Law Journal, 40, 1.
Anghie A. (2001-2002). Colonialism and the Birth of International Institutions: Sovereignty, Economy, and the Mandate System of the League of Nations, in New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 34.
Anghie A. (2004). Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law (Cambridge University Press).
Becker Lorca A. (2006). Alejandro Alvarez Situated: Subaltern Modernities and Modernisms that Subvert, in Leiden Journal of International Law, 19.
Becker Lorca A. (2010). Universal International Law: Nineteenth-Century Histories of Imposition and Appropriation, in Harvard International Law Journal, 51.
Becker Lorca A. and Alvez Marin A. (2024). Turning International Law against Indigenous Peoples, Law Working Paper/13, European University Institute Department of Law.
Borschberg P. (1998). De Societate Publica cum Infidelibus: Ein Frühwerk von Hugo Grotius, in Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Romanistische Abteilung (De Gruyter), 115.
Borschberg P. (1999). Hugo Grotius, East India Trade and the King of Johor, in Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 30, 2.
Chinkin C. (1998). International law and human rights, in T. Evans (ed.), Human rights fifty years on. A reappraisal (Manchester University Press).
Chimni B. S. (2007). The Past, Present and Future of International Law: A Critical Third World Approach, in Melbourne Journal of International Law, 8.
Derrig R. (2025). The New Haven School. American International Law (Oxford University Press).
Evans T. (2005). The Politics of Human Rights: A Global Perspective (Pluto Press).
Gozzi G. (2010). The Particularistic Universalism of International Law in the Nineteenth Century. Responding to Becker Lorca 2010, in Harvard International Law Journal, 52.
Grewe W. G. (2000). The Epochs of International Law (de Gruyter).
Grotius H. (2006). Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty, ed. Martine Julia van Ittersum (Liberty Fund).
Happold M. (2012). Introduction, in M. Happold, ed., International Law in a Multipolar World (Routledge).
Jellinek G. (1900). Allgemeine Staatslehre (O. Haring).
Kennedy D. (2023). The Context for Context: International Legal History in Struggle, in A. Brett, M. Donaldson and M. Koskenniemi, eds., History, Politics, Law (Cambridge University Press).
Kolb R. (2016). Theory of International Law (Hart Publishing).
Koskenniemi M. (2007). Methodology of International Law, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law.
Koskenniemi M. (2011). Histories of International Law: Dealing with Eurocentrism, in Rechtsgeschichte, 19.
Ilari V. (2025). In morte del mito occidentale, in Domino, 2.
Mead W. R. (2017). The Jacksonian Revolt. American Populism and the Liberal Order, in Foreign Affairs, March-April.
Onuma Y. (2010). A Transcivilizational Perspective on International Law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers).
Onuma Y. (2017). International Law in a Transcivilizational World (Cambridge University Press).
Oppenheim L. (1905). International Law. A Treatise. Vol. I. Peace (Longmans, Green, and Co.)
Oppenheim’s International Law (1996). Ninth Edition. Ed. by Sir Robert Jennings and Sir Arthur Watts (Longman).
Orakhelashvili A. (2012). Hegemony, Multipolarity and the System of International Law, in M. Happold (ed.), International Law in a Multipolar World (Routledge).
Renaut M.-H. (2007). Histoire du droit international public (Ellipses).
Schmitt C. (1995). Die letzte globale Linie, in G. Maschke, ed., Staat, Großraum, Nomos. Arbeiten aus den Jahren 1916-1969 (Duncker & Humblot).
Schmitt C. (1995). Völkerrechtliche Großraumordnung mit Interventionsverbot für raumfremde Mächte, in G. Maschke, ed., Staat, Großraum, Nomos, Arbeiten aus den Jahren 1916-1969 (Duncker & Humblot).
Schmitt C. (1943). Die letzte globale Linie, in Marine Rundschau, Translated into Italian in Schmitt C. (1994). L’ultima linea globale, in Rivista Storica VII, no. 4.
Scholte J. A. (1996). Towards a Critical Theory of Globalization, in E. Kofman and G. Youngs, eds., Globalization in Theory and Practice (Pinter Publishers).
Senga T. (1897). Gestaltung und Kritik der heutigen Konsulargerichtsbarkeit in Japan (Verlag von R. L. Prager).
Tomaševski K. (1993). Development Aid and Human Rights Revisited (Pinter Publishers).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Gustavo Gozzi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
