European Union’s Actorness Amid the Weakening Liberal International Order in the Fields of Trade, Digital Sovereignty and Conflict Resolution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.2724-6299/23017Keywords:
EU, international liberal order, international trade, digital sovereignty, conflict resolutionAbstract
This article analyses the implications for the EU’s global actorness stemming from the weakening Liberal International Order (LIO). It elaborates on the autonomous actions that the EU pursues as a response to this particular structural change. The analysis centres on four actorness criteria (Wunderlich 2011), i.e. EU’s internal self-understanding and external recognition (both forming the EU’s institutional identity), the EU’s international presence and the EU’s capability (interest, instruments) to establish how the EU adjusted in these elements. To verify this adjustment, we investigate three fields of international cooperation where the EU has developed different levels of its actorness institutionalisation, namely international trade, regulation of digital technology and international conflict resolution. Empirical results reveal that the EU has responded to the weakening LIO by adding a geopolitical dimension to its normative self-understanding, grounding this new identity in a concept of strategic autonomy in all three policy areas. Yet, in the pursuit of an autonomous international action, there is high tension between liberal values and pragmatic competitiveness or geopolitical interest revealed in all three cases. EU’s presence and international recognition are higher if this tension is lower, especially when the EU is capable to speak with one voice, such as in the case of trade and resolution of Russian aggression on Ukraine. Contrary, reconciling trade competition, digital innovation and security demands with democracy, multilateralism and respect of international law remains a critical challenge, especially when the EU’s capability is internally inconsistent.
Downloads
References
Adler-Nissen R. and Zarakol A. (2021). Struggles for Recognition: The Liberal International Order and the Merger of Its Discontents, in International Organization, vol. 75(2), 611–634.
Adler-Nissen R. and Eggeling K. A. (2024). The Discursive Struggle for Digital Sovereignty: Security, Economy, Rights and the Cloud Project Gaia-X, in Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 62(4), 993–1011.
Akgül-Açıkmeşe S. and Özel S. (2024). EU Policy towards the Israel-Palestine Conflict: The Limitations of Mitigation Strategies, in The International Spectator, vol. 59(1), 59–78.
Anghel S. and Džankić J. (2023). EU enlargement in a geopolitical era: Between acceleration and ambiguity, in Journal of European Integration, vol. 45(6), 789–805.
Bouchard C. and Drieskens E. (2013). The European Union in UN politics, in K. E. Jørgensen and K. V. Laatikainen (eds.), Routledge Handbook on the European Union and International Institutions (Routledge), 115–127.
Bojinović Fenko A. and Brsakoska-Bazerkoska J. (2024) The EU as a Global Actor: The Significance of Changes in the World Order From 2004 to 2024 as Regards EU Actorness, in Studia Europejskie – Studies in European Affairs, no. 2, 7-26.
Briganti Dini G. (2025). The EU’s Response to the Fragmented Emergence of Artificial Intelligence, in O. Costa et al. (eds.), EU Foreign Policy in a Fragmenting International Order (Palgrave-McMillan), 207-233.
Bradford A. (2023). Digital Empires: The Global Battle to Regulate Technology (OUP).
Bradford A. (2020). The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World (OUP).
Bretherton C. and Vogler J. (2006). The European Union as a Global Actor, 2nd (Routledge).
Cardwell P. J. and Moret E. (2023). The EU, sanctions and regional leadership, in European Security, vol. 32, no. 1, 1-21.
Chatterjee M. and Naka I. (2022). Twenty years of BRICS: Political and economic transformations through the lens of land, in Oxford Development Studies, vol. 50(1), 2–13.
Cheslow D. and Pollet M. (2025). Europe wants to free itself from US tech. Can it? Politico, 5 July 2025, https://www.politico.com/newsletters/digital-future-daily/2025/05/07/daniella-euro-stack-00333636.
Council of the EU. (2025, 10 October). Israel/Palestine: statement by the High Representative on behalf of the European Union on the Comprehensive Plan to end the Gaza Conflict. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/10/10/israelpalestine-stateme-nt-by-the-high-representative-on-behalf-of-the-european-union-on-the-comprehensive-plan-t-o-end-the-gaza-conflict/.
Donnelly S., Ríos Camacho E. and Heidebrecht S. (2024). Digital sovereignty as control: the regulation of digital finance in the European Union, in Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 31(8), 2226–2249.
Eliasson J. and Garcia-Duran P. (2025). EU Trade Policy in Light of a Fragmented Liberal International Order, in O. Costa et al. (eds.), EU Foreign Policy in a Fragmenting International Order (Palgrave-McMillan), 27-55.
Fahey E. and Mancini I. (2022). Introduction: understanding the EU as a good global actor: whose metrics?, in E. Fahey and I. Mancini (eds.), Understanding the EU as a Good Global Actor - Ambitions, Values and Metrics (Edward Elgar Publishing), 1-17.
Fahey E. (2024). Legal convergence through soft law? The EU-US trade and technology council (TTC), in European Foreign Affairs Review, vol. 29(4), 471–492.
Flonk D., Jachtenfuchs M. and Obendiek A. (2024). Controlling internet content in the EU: towards digital sovereignty, in Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 31(8), 2316–2342.
Ginsberg R. H. (2001). The European Union in International Politics: Baptism by Fire (Rowman and Littlefield).
Ginsberg R. H. (1999). Conceptualizing the European Union as an international actor: Narrowing the theoretical capability–expectations gap, in Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 37(3), 429–454.
Hill C. (1993). The Capability-Expectations Gap, or Conceptualizing Europe’s International Role, in Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 31 (3), 305–328.
Hočevar M., Rutar T. and Lovec M. (2023) (eds.). The neoliberal world order in crisis, and beyond: an East European perspective (FDV).
Ikenberry J. G. (2018). The end of liberal international order?, in International Affairs, vol. 94 (1), 7–24.
Lake D. A., Martin L. L. and Risse T. (2021). Challenges to the liberal order: Reflections on international organization, in International Organization, vol. 75(2), 225–257.
Mearsheimer J. J. (2019). Bound to fail. The rise and fall of the liberal international order, in International Security, vol. 43(4), 7–50.
Nord M., Altman D., Angiolillo F., Fernandes T., Good God A. and Lindberg S. I. (2025). Democracy report 2025: 25 years of autocratization – Democracy trumped?, V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg. https://v-dem.net/documents/60/V-dem-dr__2025_lowres.pdf.
Renda A. (2021). Securing 5G: The EU Toolbox and the challenge of coordinated cybersecurity governance, in Journal of Cyber Policy, vol. 6(1), 123–142.
Roberts A., Choer Moraes H. and Ferguson V. (2019). Toward a geo-economic order in international trade and investment, in Journal of International Economic Law, vol. 22, 655–676.
Sheikh H. (2022). European Digital Sovereignty: A Layered Approach, in Digital Society, no. 1, 1-25.
Sjöstedt G. (1977). The External Role of the European Community (Saxon House).
Soler E. (2024). Cracks in EU Foreign Policy: Exposing Divisions over Palestine and Israel amidst the Gaza War, in IE Med, https://www.iemed.org/publication/cracks-in-eu-foreign-policy-exposing-divisions-over-palestine-and-israel-amidst-the-gaza-war/.
Steinbach A. (2023). The EU’s turn to ‘strategic autonomy’: Leeway for policy action and points of conflict, in European Journal of International Law, vo. 34(4), 973–1006.
Vangeli A., Bojinović Fenko A. and Kočan F. (2025). Doomscrollers by Day, Gamers by Night: Patching Digital Sovereignty in the Western Balkan States Amid US-China Technological Rivalry, in Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 1–23.
Vignoli V., Onderco M. and Kalhousová I. (2025). Who cares: Why the Israeli–Palestinian conflict matters (more) to some EU member states, in Journal of Common Market Studies, Advance online publication, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.70058.
Wodak R. (2019). Entering the ‘post-shame era’: The rise of illiberal democracy, populism and neo-authoritarianism in Europe, in Global Discourse, vol. 9(1), 195–213.
Wunderlich J.-U. (2011). European Integration, Global governance and international relations, in J.-U. Wunderlich and J. D. Bailey (eds.), The European Union and Global Governance: A Handbook (Routledge), 48–55.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ana Bojinović Fenko , Julija Brsakoska Bazerkoska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
